January 3, 2021

Part 2


Here is the continuation of yesterday's post from Mike (Misha) Hendrickson.  If you would like to contact him with questions, his e-mail address is mikenlori9@gmail.com.  

COVID Vaccines Research –paper #2

(Note that a great deal of time has been invested in researching this paper – time sorting through government documents and trying to find real information in public sources. It is now late December 2020 and both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have been recommended for emergency use.)

The initial research you received was concluded with a chart reflecting that people were testing positive for flu at the height of this flu season at less than 1% of the rate of last year as reported by public health labs and at 10% of the prior year as reported by clinical labs. Yet, we have not heard from CDC or FDA that the flu was even on the decrease. It is obvious that they have simply shifted the flu numbers over to COVID, which would explain the most significant part of the spike in COVID. Note that there is always a spike in flu in the fall (i.e., flu season) when the trees go dormant and we have a greater ratio of carbon dioxide to oxygen in the air.

(The chart was not included in the previous post)

Lest I sound negative about vaccines, let me be clear. I am sure that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines work to reduce the incidence of the virus. However, I am deeply concerned, especially about the long-term effects of the vaccines. In particular, I am concerned about the mRNA technology in the vaccines, which has never been introduced into any vaccine before and had an incredibly short test period before being released to be tested via vaccination on the world population.


There is a lot in this document so here is a Summary of Conclusions of research #2 (the numbers below correspond to explanatory paragraph numbers that follow):

By now we have all heard of an Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”). It was made into law (2013) so they could have a way to get a vaccine to the public without rigorous testing for efficacy (and also, as it turns out, for safety). In mid-March of this year, having their sights set on producing a vaccine for COVID, without public notice or governmental hearings and acting on the authority of the EUA, they simply issued a blanket order relieving the pharmaceutical companies of liability if anything goes wrong.

For an EUA to be issued, there cannot be a viable treatment option. However, there appear to be viable options that are being silenced.

One of the early actions taken by the FDA was to eliminate liability for the safety and efficacy of any vaccine that was developed. The CDC, FDA and pharmaceutical companies are accorded immunity from prosecution while they operate under the EUA.

We should all be concerned that molecular biologists are experimenting with our DNA, since by their own admission they know very little about our DNA having declared the vast majority of DNA to be “junk”. What if it isn’t junk and actually has an, as yet unknown, purpose?

There is a growing list of doctors and scientists who have objected to the “rush to vaccinate” and who have said the approach to the “pandemic” is completely counter to sound health.

Organizations such as Children’s Health Defense (Robert F Kennedy, Jr.) have a growing mountain of evidence that this is more about a “race to get rich” than a race to secure health. Serious reactions to the dangerous PEG additive (defined in 6 below) and the experimental nature of mRNA are clearly present and are ignored by the FDA, CDC and mainstream news.[1]

Forced vaccinations are upon us and force is being used to eliminate “informed consent” both individually and parentally.

It is not surprising that in this “warp speed” to a vaccine, that there are several things we don’t know and which are particularly troublesome about the vaccines.

We are all watching small businesses struggle and go under. Several shops on El Paseo in Palm Desert have closed and restaurants are limping along with only take-out orders which have put wait staff out of work. Governors are willing to go along even at the risk of bankrupting their states. California uses the threat of removal of liquor licenses to make restaurants obey. This is a mess and all of the focus is on what many doctors have argued is simply a bad flu season. [No further references below for this.]

1. Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”)– allowed only if no viable option

Neither the Pfizer nor Moderna vaccines have yet been licensed[2]but rather are being manufactured and distributed under an Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”). An EUA can only be issued if there are no viable options (actual wording from FDA guidance document states: For FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition).

See footnote 2 above: Licensure, the first of three processes, involves gaining approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). As a result, it is the longest of these processes. It [approval] can take years, even decades, before pharmaceutical companies can actually start providing the vaccine. For example, the varicella vaccine [chickenpox, a simple childhood illness, which most of us in my generation had as a kid] took nearly 11 years to be licensed by the FDA.

This gets more interesting when you consider that the products that Pharmaceutical companies can distribute under an EUA only need to pass the standard of “May Be Effective”. You might recall from the first research paper that Pfizer used that sort of language in its proposal to the FDA where they said “it is reasonable to believe that…the vaccine… “may be effective”. They didn’t have to say that the vaccine had been demonstrated to be effective – or even demonstrated to be safe for that matter!

In the words of the FDA as set forth in their December 18, 2020 press release “…although not an FDA approval, the FDA’s expectations described in our June and October guidance documents have been met,” said Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., Director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.

2. Were there viable options? Yes!

Is hydroxychloroquine a viable option? Early on we heard from numerous doctors from LA to NYC that they were using hydroxychloroquine with tremendous success. The drug is over 60 years old so its patents have long ago expired, which means that it is a very inexpensive option.  What was FDA’s response? On June 15, 2020 they withdrew their approval of the drug for emergency use of malaria, said it had serious side effects, and noted it was “unlikely “to be effective in treating COVID-19. [Reported by Lev Facher at Stat+.] There you go, viable option #1 eliminated with a stroke of the pen! So, if you were a doctor, would you publicly recommend it, or even prescribe it for your patients, after FDA’s action to discredit it?

Ivermectin is a drug developed in Japan that has proven safe and has been used since 1987.Ivermectin was recently researched for covidvirus treatment at the University of Wisconsin by Dr Pierre Kory as well as being researched elsewhere. Here is one research study that shows incredibly successful results:Ivermectin ScienceDirect I have not seen FDA comments on Ivermectin so I assume they are giving it the silent treatment since there are numerous studies demonstrating its effectiveness in treating the covidvirus.

Also, Dr Pierre Kory gave passionate testimony to the Senate’s Homeland Security Committee on December 8, 2020 about Ivermectin. It is clear from his testimony and the extensive testing undertaken (over 30 studies) related to its use against the covidvirus that Ivermectin is clearly a valid treatment option. Not surprisingly, the patents for Ivermectin have expired so you can buy it online for a few cents per pill (doctor prescription is of course required). Dr Pierre Kory testimony [The link has had nearly 6 million hits!]

I stopped looking for options after these two because it is clear from the FDA’s action with hydroxychloroquine and silence with respect to Ivermectin that they are not interested in existing inexpensive drugs. If I was concerned about getting the virus, I would declare symptoms and ask a medical provider to prescribe Ivermectin.

3. Shortly after the virus was discovered in the US, action was taken to grant immunity to those who manufacture, distribute and administer the “experimental” vaccinations

See Federal Register of March 17, 2020: “The Secretary is issuing this Declaration pursuant to section 319-F of the Public Health Service Act to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19.”

From lockdown to a police state is not that great of a distance as noted by a friend in Hungary upon return from the USA: “I had to be quarantined for 10 days once I arrived from the US and the police came to check on me daily if I was actually at home - it was an interesting experience to say the least. There's also a curfew from 8 pm till 5 am each day.”[Quoted with permission]

The International Consortium of Independent Journalists (“ICIJ”), the organization that broke the Panama Papers, the Paradise Papers and Isabel dos Santos’s theft of billions from Angola, has recently reported on kickbacks in medicine. Salix drug maker pleads guilty to FRAUD  Robert F Kennedy, Jr has pointed out that this problem goes deeply into the CDC as well with the payments of large commissions to scientists developing vaccines. Doctors we know are edgy about how blatant pharmaceutical companies are about offering trips and other perks to doctors. Note that professional ethics are compromised when an agency and its scientists receive financial incentives for developing drugs or vaccines while at the same time having responsibility for the safety of the drugs and vaccines and for the protection of the public. Likewise, professional ethics are compromised when doctors receive financial incentives to recommend particular drugs to their patients.

4. The messenger RNA (mRNA) is an experimental application

One of the concerns about science is its willingness to test “in the interest of science”. When science is unbridled, a lot can go wrong. One of the reasons for the Nuremberg trials was the willingness of German scientists to experiment with human beings. That process was banned by international law following the Nuremberg trials, yet here we are with two vaccines, neither of which were tested on animals, an essential step in the development of vaccines.

Is the willingness to experiment on stage here? Are they conducting a DNA experiment, with the entire world population by skipping animal testing? We should all be asking a lot of questions right now about the limits of testing “in the interest of science”.

Molecular biology says that over 90% of our DNA is junk. Intuitively, that feels false to me. In an intuition-based ethics class that I taught for seven years at the University of North Dakota, I asked students questions which, after some training, were answered intuitively. One of the questions was this very question about DNA; did they feel that the vast majority of their DNA was junk? No student ever answered yes!

The molecular biologists at pharmaceutical companies are from the same group of molecular biologists who have declared that most of our DNA is junk. They claim they have developed effective vaccines. However, they are using mRNA for the first time ever), using a technology never before tested in humans. They have somehow decided it is okay to play with our DNA and yet they don’t know the purpose of most of our DNA. Does that feel right to you? Do you think they might be more concerned with science than safety?

5. One of the rules is that individual doctors are not allowed to speak out against big pharmaceutical companies or the medical hierarchy

Following the FDA response in June (2 above), doctors mounted the steps of the Supreme Court in July as reported by Memphis News Channel 3. “The video, which was [viewed] by President Donald Trump before being removed [by Facebook, Twitter, Google and YouTube], featured members of the group, America’s Frontline Doctors, standing on the steps of the Supreme Court claiming that masks aren’t necessary to prevent the spread of coronavirus and promoting hydroxychloroquine as a cure. “We have just met with Vice President Mike Pence to request the administration’s assistance in empowering doctors to prescribe hydroxychloroquine without political obstruction,” Simone Gold, the group’s leader, tweeted. “We also discussed the recent censorship of doctors on social media platforms.”

In addition to the doctors who stood on the steps of the Supreme Court to object to the pandemic, the list of doctors objecting includes a panel of European doctors who have called the lockdowns “criminal to the elderly”; also doctors such as Dr Zach Bush, Dr Sheri Tenpenny, Dr Rachid Buttar, Dr Andrew Gentempo, Dr Andrew Wakefield, Doctor and scientist James Chestnut, Dr Kelly Brogan, doctor and author, Judi Mikovits; and non-doctors such as Brian Hooker, William Thompson and Robert F Kennedy, Jr.

Nearly every one of those named above have been censored by Facebook, Google, Twitter and YouTube. How is that possible in a democracy where freedom of speech should be fundamental so we can have honest discussions and debates on issues affecting all of us?

6. Serious Reactions from potentially dangerous additives

In the “warp speed” drive for a vaccine and the drive to vaccinate the planet, there is a tendency to overlook the dangers. So, let’s be clear – vaccines pose a risk and the risk is real. For example, Children’s Health Defense reports cases of anaphylactic shock acknowledged by the FDA. They also reference an Illinois hospital shutting down its vaccination program because of serious reactions of healthcare workers. Also, there are PEG reactions (PEG is a petroleum-based additive), FDA Warning.21 Dec 2020

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., CHD chairman and chief legal counsel, said: “As we told the FDA in September, studies show that one in seven Americans may unknowingly be at risk of experiencing an allergic reaction to PEG.”Kennedy noted in the letter that the PEG additive is dangerous and warned that it was known to cause “life-threatening anaphylaxis”. They told him to take his concern directly to the vaccine manufactures!

In addition, Moderna has acknowledged the potential for its proprietary lipid nanoparticles (LNP), PEG or mRNA to produce “systemic side effects. …” Moderna states:“[T]here can be no assurance that our LNPs will not have undesired effects. Our LNPs could contribute, in whole or in part, to one or more of the following: immune reactions, infusion reactions, complement reactions, opsonation[opsonization] reactions, antibody reactions . . . or reactions to the PEG from some lipids or PEG otherwise associated with the LNP. Certain aspects of our investigational medicines may induce immune reactions from either the mRNA or the lipid as well as adverse reactions within liver pathways or degradation of the mRNA or the LNP, any of which could lead to significant adverse events…”

7. Forced Vaccinations

On August 24, 2020, the FDA made it clear that they were going to proceed to forced vaccinations and end any hope of having an “informed consent” process with the experimental vaccines. As always, no hearing, no public debate, just an edict from an institutional hierarchy.Third Amendment to EUA Expect them to target schools and to institute travel restrictions soon.

How serious is this virus? Of course, it is serious, yet a total of 1.4 million people worldwide died from TB in 2019. We know that covid deaths are being inflated and even at that covid deaths worldwide at 1.8 million are not significantly higher than TB deaths. They could just as easily have called TB a pandemic (the vaccine patents have expired so doses are quite cheap).

8. Safety and things we do not know

One simple thing that we do not know is the real source of the SARS CO V-2 virus. The USA says it came from a market in Wuhan but the Chinese have conducted a study of the market and determined that the claim is false. The study has been published in a peer-reviewed medical journal. Although US studies argue that the virus is natural, an international study is adamant that the virus is synthetic Int'l Journal of Medicine Abstract

STAT reported on December 19, 2020 the following in a pro-vaccine, side-by-side comparison of Pfizer and Moderna:

Not known if vaccinated people can transmit the virus. [Really, then what is the point of requiring everyone to be vaccinated?]

Moderna’s dosage is more than three times that of Pfizer with no better result than the Pfizer vaccine. [Yet, at least so far, you will not have a choice of which vaccine you receive, even if you are forced into being vaccinated. Also, why didn’t the FDA question Moderna’s use of a three-times higher dosage, which in its trials was not as effective Pfizer’s?]

It is not known whether either vaccine prevents asymptomatic infection.

Both vaccines fall into the reactogenic category of vaccines, meaning they are expected to produce adverse events. The advisory committee (US) has advised hospitals to stagger vaccinations and in Britain those administering vaccinations have been advised to have standby emergency treatment for possible adverse events.

There has been no determination of how long the vaccination will last, which begs the question of why two doses are required, except for tracking purposes.

Part of the stated reason given for tracking is so they can determine how many vaccinated people are getting the virus and give booster shots. [But apparently not so they could declare the vaccines ineffective.]

According to an FDA press release on December 18, 2020, “The most commonly reported side effects, which typically lasted several days, were pain at the injection site, tiredness, headache, muscle pain, chills, joint pain, swollen lymph nodes in the same arm as the injection, nausea and vomiting, and fever.”[Interestingly, there is no mention of Bells Palsy, which has occurred; likewise, no mention of anaphylactic shock, an allergic reaction to the antigen, which has also occurred and which can be fatal. According to the Mayo Clinic anaphylaxis is a severe, potentially life-threaten allergic reactions.]

On one hand, we are asked to believe that it was necessary to grant immunity to vaccine manufacturers and others involved in the administering of the vaccines, while on the other hand we are told to accept that the forced vaccinations are rational. There is a poster going about that says we have a vaccine so safe that one needs to be forced to take it for a virus so dangerous that you need to be tested to know you have it.


I will just close this with a personal observation which is that I know far more people who have tested positive with no symptoms than I do people who have been tested positive and who have been sick. Also, we know of people in both California and North Dakota who went to get tested but it was taking too long so they left. In both cases they were sent notices that they tested positive. Apparently, you don’t have to be tested to add to the statistics telling us that the problem is growing!  Also, all of the people who have died that I have heard about from those I know have all had co-morbidities. This includes a report from a doctor in the family who has had six patients die who were called covidvirus deaths; all had co-morbidities and five of them were over age 90!

Finally, if they really wanted people to be healthy, they would do everything in their power to reduce fear. They are not; instead, they are fueling the fear and ignoring the tremendous negative health effects of fear. Consequently, numerous doctors are crying “foul” and speaking out.

[1] Example of factual news about early issues with the vaccines: Severe reactions Pfizer Vaccine

[2]From Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia – how a vaccine gets licensed Vaccine licensing

No comments:

Post a Comment